As schools and districts explore AI-driven edtech solutions, the challenge lies in finding tools that enhance educational experiences without overshadowing the role of teachers, as highlighted by EdSurge. The LEARN Network, a federal initiative, provides insights into effective edtech selection, emphasizing that AI should empower educators and address genuine needs rather than offer generic, surface-level benefits.

Core Guidelines for Choosing Edtech Solutions:

1. Differentiating Student and Staff-Focused AI: Schools should distinguish between AI tools for students, which require careful safeguards to ensure privacy and reduce bias, and tools for administrators, which should prioritize operational efficiency and support staff expertise.
2. Assessing Evidence Reliability: A product’s evidence base is critical, but even high ESSA evidence tiers may only reflect general strategies rather than specific program effectiveness. Products meeting Tiers 1 and 2 have undergone rigorous evaluation, often cited in resources like What Works Clearinghouse, but local pilots can help validate effectiveness in specific school contexts.
3. Clear Understanding of School Needs: Leaders should clearly define their educational challenges before adopting new tech. Solutions that directly address identified issues are more likely to be embraced by educators and yield better results.
4. Product Development and Inclusivity: Effective edtech stems from collaboration with diverse stakeholders—teachers, school leaders, and students. A community-focused approach helps ensure products are relevant and able to meet the unique needs of each school.
5. Prioritizing Equity: Equity should be central in selecting AI tools. This means choosing solutions that are accessible and relevant for diverse student populations. LEARN Network resources, like the LEARN to Scale Toolkit and Stories of Scaling series, provide actionable guidance for integrating equity in product selection.

The rise of AI-powered edtech is an opportunity for schools to seek tools that prioritize educational impact over flashy features. By focusing on proven evidence, understanding specific needs, ensuring a contextual fit, fostering inclusivity, and incorporating diverse perspectives, educational leaders can make more informed choices that lead to meaningful improvements.